Skip to content
    All momentsMoment category · Conflict

    De-escalating a Heated Moment

    Taking responsibility for bringing the temperature down — whether or not you started it, and whether or not it is aimed at you. Somebody has to lower it, the heat does not come down on its own, and it will not be the angriest person in the room.

    A peer has come to have it out with you. She has three grievances, and you are part of the problem.

    14Skill
    Signals
    Research Prevalence
    No. 16

    9.4%

    of the 11,359 leadership cases in our research

    Report 01, draft

    Why it's hard

    When someone raises their voice, you have two easy exits: match the heat, or shut the conversation down. Both feel like control. Both cost you.

    And you're in it too. Your first response is usually a defence, aimed at showing it isn't your fault, and that's exactly what keeps the temperature rising.

    De-escalating means lowering the heat without dropping the issue. The problem still needs solving once everyone can hear each other again.

    What we look for

    Here is an example of some of the Skill Signals that we teach you how to implement and then test for as you progress with this skill

    Skill Signal Groups
    • First response
    • Lowering it
    • Moving forward
    Some sample Skill Signals
    1. You did not defend in your first turn

    2. You named what you had heard

    3. You offered a concrete next step

    A sample of 14 Skill Signals. The assessment also looks for behaviours we don’t list.

    Try it without anyone watching

    One four-minute conversation from De-escalating a Heated Moment. See your initial feedback straight away, then save your results with a free account.

    No account to start. No card. Your employer can't see how you did.

    How your practice stays private

    Questions about this moment.

    Individual contributor: Moderate; First-line manager: Core; Mid-level leader: Core; Executive: High. Low relevance means the moment is not offered at that level.

    It appears in 9.4% of 11,359 real leadership cases in draft Research Report 01.

    The assessment uses 14 observational markers across 3 groups. This page shows only a small sample, because held-out assessment depends on some behaviours remaining unseen.